Absolute Trust?

The first trustworthy article on promises and dependability generated a lot of off-line conversation. Here’s one of the most interesting threads from a few brilliant friends:

I’m thinking trustworthiness is never absolute, highly contextual, and probably rarely enduring. – JT

I think you are correct. There are reliable people who are not trustworthy. In fact, I can imagine situations where one could set a watch by how reliably predictable ‘untrustworthy’ people are. I wonder if the converse is true – Can someone be trustworthy without being reliable or is it a prerequisite?

It just seems as if someone is trustworthy if you are willing to put your trust in them in any multitude of ways (and it could be just one way, like, I have a very trustworthy mechanic and I put my trust in his ability to consistently, fairly, and competently fix my car and charge me a fair amount, etc.), but that same person has the power to, at any point in time, break that trust. Similarly, one may be trustworthy to some, but not to others. So it seems odd to attempt to place the label on a person as a characteristic rather than on a relationship at a point in time, or on a trend in regards to a specific kind of action over time (e.g. the mechanic). – JT

I don’t think trustworthiness is an absolute, so if you lie once in your entire life then you’re untrustworthy, that kind of interpretation is an impossible standard. So going forward we tend to think of things in absolutes, and it just does not work with how people really are. Also, you are looking at something that is the definition of subjective. Take the example of a secret, if the person keeps a secret of mine are they trustworthy? Too me, yes. Now that secret applies to you, but this person will not tell you. So in one example you have a person who is simultaneously building trust with me and eroding it with you. -CV

I love that example. By extrapolation, trust is subjective but can be calculated implicitly by matching values against values. I wonder if it’s possible to trust someone who holds values anti-ethical to my own? If not, does a lack of trustworthiness merely indicate a difference of values?

Yes I can trust someone with ethics counter to my own, but here’s the rub, when I think about it I’m not sure how I come to that conclusion. Is it the person I’m trusting or is it that I trust what the person will do or say based on their own ethical stance. If it’s the latter then given enough knowledge of a persons ethos then I can trust anyone.

Also, we tend to compartmentalize our trust in people. Take a hacker for example, you’re not going to trust him with your PC but they are going to be the first people to look for when putting together a tiger team to test a networks security. We actually break our trust down into the segments of a person we find appealing. – CV

What are your thoughts on Absolute Trust? Share in the comments below.

Time is Going to Pass Anyway

Time is going to pass anyway. Why not be happy?

People talk about what they’d like to do, what they like to be. You see that glint of excitement in their eyes as they imagine this future, improved, accomplished self. But sadly that reverie is often short-lived. Fears and doubts come into mind. Their speech turns from that of hopeful actions to hedges, equivocations, and excuses.

When queried, you hear a lot of phrases that amount to ‘the real world got in the way.’
Admit it. You’ve done it. I know I’ve done this more times than I’d care to admit!

There is nothing more real than the passage of time. It’s going to occur whether you like it or not. Why indulge that future state you see? Why not make a plan to conquer all of your obstacles and pursue that dream? You only get this one chance at life; why not make it a happy one?

This entry was posted in Core and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Art of Happiness

As part of my on-going Scout law project and in the spirit of reviewing the Scout Law of Cheerful, I’ve been examining the roots of happiness. One quote comes foremost to my mind on this topic:
thailand koh samet beach umbrellas

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” – United States Declaration of Independence as adopted by the Second Continental Congress.

In the United States, all we are guaranteed is the ability to pursue it. It’s up to us to make it happen.

So how do we do that?

“I urge you to please notice when you are happy, and exclaim or murmur or think at some point, ‘If this isn’t nice, I don’t know what is.’” – Kurt Vonnegut

This is beautiful advice. Make a habit of noticing the good things and it is amazing how much sweeter life tastes. I’ve made a ritual of this each morning with my Grateful Project and it has made all of the difference in the world.

Can We Engineer Happiness?

Possibly. I’ve noticed that setting goals, working towards them, and achieving them makes me happy. I’m naturally resistant to other people’s goals, so mine, as long as they make sense to me , are a great way for me to stay happy.

Life doesn’t have ‘easy play’ settings like video games. No. It’s hardball 24-7 out there. And sometimes those hardballs hit you with such force that it’s impossible to remember ever being happy. Or that you’ll be happy again. The best you can do is to keep plugging along reciting ‘This too shall pass.’

For the times when you can’t create your own fun, or you are stuck in a rut, I like to remember this quote from author Timothy Ferriss from his book the The 4-Hour Workweek (highly recommended to anyone looking to quit their job or get better at the one they already hold.)

“The opposite of love is indifference, and the opposite of happiness is boredom.” ― Timothy Ferriss, The 4-Hour Workweek

Keeping that in mind, I find action and production to be a great way at keeping myself happy. Your mileage may vary. Remember, you must be an active participant in your own survival.What sure-fire ways do you have to keep happy?

Gratitude and Cheerfulness

Somewhere along the line I realized that I use social media to vent too often. Thus, my public record reads as one of discontent. I’m much more cheerful than that! As part of my on-going Scout law project and in the spirit of reviewing the Scout Law of Cheerful, I’ve decided it’s time to change that.

thailand flowers

How does Gratitude affect Cheerfulness?

Everyone has their own personal list of emotional triggers. What makes me happy may not elicit the same response from you. But is there a universal experience that we all share? Is there something that can make you universally cheerful?

I’m not sure, but gratitude seems to be a good candidate for an indicator of cheerfulness. When you recognize a situation with heartfelt gratitude, you are stating that you are glad for the outcome. And you’d be hard pressed to find a cheerful person who isn’t filled with gratitude.

Try this exercise: make a list of things you are grateful for and see if that simple recognition doens’t make you immediately feel happier! If you’d like to try this in a public forum, join me in the #GratefulProject and make 1 post about something you are grateful for everyday for a year. You can see mine on my twitter feed. Alternately you can see everyone tagging their posts with #GratefulProject here.

Opportunities, Strategies, Tactics

Years ago I was working with a high-level technology executive to align my program’s direction with his over-all goals for the division. Since I worked for him, I needed his buy-in. His blessing could go a long way in providing legitimacy for our efforts and making it easier to get good work done. But I also wanted his advice. After all, he had accomplished a lot in his career and the chief benefit of my position was to learn from high-achievers like him.

thailand 1

The core concept of the meeting was that there was that there was an near inifinite amount of work that could be done. What we were searching for was, given limited resources, what work should be done.

I had prepared for the meeting and had made a list of actions I thought we should take substantiated by all sorts of documentation and metrics. I had brought with me an insane amount of ancillary items so I could facilitate a discussion no matter which way it turned. I thought I was ready to rock! The only problem was that I had geared up for the wrong conversation.

How to Make Decisions Like a CEO

At the executive level I find the focus is on what is worth doing. After all, people in these positions have hundreds or thousands of people at their disposal, thus a lot of capacity to do things. But what is worth spending those precious, finite resources on? It is the ability to consistently and accurately make those judgement calls that they get paid the big bucks for. After a few years in this arena, I believe I’ve spotted a pattern to how they do it, and how everyone can apply it successfully in our day-to-day lives.


Each successful executive I have met takes the time to examine their field of operations and suss out a philosophy of action. That’s why you see devices like ‘Mission statements’ or ‘Flywheels’ or all other abstract-level communication devices come out of these offices.

The first step is to identify an ideal end state; be it a self-sustaining model, an exit strategy, or other ultimate goal. The next step is to devise a philosophy of action is by identifying the gaps between the current state and the ideal. This includes both the areas of highest return and the immediate danger areas and shoals an organization can wreck itself on. It is this delta that generates the opportunities.


Once you have an understanding of the opportunities, you can move on to addressing them and closing that delta. A phrase I hear a lot from executives is “There are many roads that lead to Rome.” For each Opportunity you can have multiple strategies. Strategies are the possible ways you can address the delta.

It is unlikely you’ll choose to implement all of strategies that are presented on the table. In fact, some may preclude others. Also worth noting is that some strategies implemented on one opportunity may address others very well. Or some strategies for one Opportunity may complement other strategies on another. Identifying these synergies requires a reasoned approach and a lot of experience.


This is where the ‘rubber meets the road.’ Tactics are the individual courses of action that you will take to implement your strategies and reach your goal. These items are not abstract. They are clear, concise deliverables that have measurable begin and end states.

How to Apply This

In that meeting I was prepared to showcase the individual tactics I had devised. Implicitly I had reviewed the opportunities as I had seen them, assigned strategies, and jumped right into tactics. My mindset was to line up tasks and then complete them. After all, that was what had brought me success in the past.

The executive I was working with saw this and identified it as a hall mark of someone new to the concepts of thinking across a larger scale. Fortunately for me he had the patience to bring my vision up to a larger scale. I wish I could report that I grasped the concepts of what he was trying to do and was immediately able to apply them, but I was not able to. It was not until my flight home when I consolidated my notes that I began to discern the pattern.


I can’t show you how I’ve applied this on the job, so let’s try a few other examples.


Opportunity: Watching tape a coach notices that his offensive play makers have a comparative speed advantage over the defense.

Strategy: The coach decides to exploit that advantage by spreading his offense over the entire field.

Tactics: Implement the read-option where the quarterback or running back force defenses to commit to a space and then quickly move the ball to an open spot where the defense isn’t.

Small Business (My web design company)

Opportunity: Lots of small business owners (my target audience) use Craigslist for advertising because they have no time / aptitude for web campaigns.

Strategy: To be a go-to resource for small business owners using Craigslist.

Tactics: Wrote numerous tutorials for people advertising on Craigslist. Show them how a website complements their actions and can lead to more customers.

Unfortunately the executive in this example moved on to another field before I was able to demonstrate that I learned my lesson. Luckily I’ve been able to apply it multiple times over to great success. Hopefully you will, too!

This entry was posted in Core and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Honesty and Truthfulness

Tell the truth and keep your promises. Be honest and dependable. Seems terribly simple, doesn’t it? These are characteristics we all can cite as important. No one would have an issue with this ideal being taught to children. And I am sure everyone reading this would say they are trustworthy themselves. But once you dig a little deeper and apply an adult perspective things change…. or do they? For this next part of my Scout Law project, let’s examine Honesty & Truthfulness in terms of the value Trustworthy.


Honesty and truthfulness

Do you always tell the truth?

I’ll save you the suspense – no, you probably do not. I know I do not always tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. And I doubt you do either. If we didn’t, society might look like this:

The Invention of Lying

The Invention of Lying

Does that make us liars? Yes, it probably does. Does that make us less than trustworthy? Good question. Perhaps it’s a matter of serving the greater good.

The shades of truth approach is usually reserved protect someone’s feelings but sometimes it can be for convenience. I believe it’s that shift that is the slippery moral slope.

In this context, it’s not difficult to see why we would want our sons and daughters to be honest. But would we want them to be in all cases? There’s no surprise why trustworthiness is a universal moray – it’s a necessary stitch in the fabric of community. But how about Honesty? Tell us what you think in the comments below.



Promises and Dependability

The first Scout Law is for a Scout to be Trustworthy. I’ve been thinking on the meaning of this word as part of my Scout Law project. It’s a complex issue that I am finding requires the examination of multiple perspectives. For this post, I’d like to investigate how promises (fulfilled or otherwise) and dependability factor into the value we label Trustworthy.

thailand sunset restaurant

One Way to Measure Trust

A year ago I was in a meeting about surveying our clients’ perspective on my organization’s performance. The idea of the survey was a followup on the idea of Net Promoter Score (NPS), made popular by Frederick F. Reichheld in a 2003 Harvard Business Review article titled ‘The One Number You Need to Grow.‘ The reason we were employing NPS was to calibrate our service model to our client’s needs.

The NPS tactics included create a comprehensive survey with open ended questions and a rating mechanism. If respondents scored our services low enough, we labeled them as ‘detractors.’ If they scored us within a certain band, they were  quantified as neutral. If they rated our service high enough, they were seen as promoters. To find your score you subtract the detractors from the promoters and divide that sum by the total opportunities. The goal then is to improve that score over time based on the feedback to the open ended questions in the survey. Other options include closing the loop and working with the survey respondents to improve your processes.

While we were designing  the survey I found it amazing how close the questions clients are surveyed with are to promises kept and dependability. We debated several questions, the phrasing of the questions, and what exactly it was that we were after.

Note: If you 1) are in business, 2) in management, 3) have clients or aspire to any of those 3 AND you’re not familiar with Net Promoter score, it’s worth learning. Here’s the wikipedia description, here’s a summary from Harvard Business Review (where the idea was originally published in 2003), and here’s a link to buy the entire pdf from Amazon The One Number You Need to Grow.

In the end what I suggested that what we really wanted to discover was our client’s level of trust. After all, that’s what everyone gets hired for in the end; management’s trust in you to employ your skills and exhibit good judgement. The group agreed with me and we proceeded to ask very tough questions to ascertain out client’s level of trust in our organization.

How does the ability to deliver on promises impact trustworthiness to you? How does dependability impact trustworthiness in your eyes? What criteria do people have to display to earn your trust? How do they lose it?

Do you think you could adapt the corporate concept of Net Promoter Score to your personal life? Have you? What were the results?

Tell us in the comments.

On Character and Characters

Last post I described my Scout Law Project and promised to shed some light on why I was doing it. The overwhelming justification is for me to examine base principles and to practice writing about them. Two items I am particularly interested in exploring are Character and Framework. Today’s article is on Character. Hope you like it!

cambodia road stop

On the Character of Characters

Think of every piece of fiction that you have ever loved. No matter the genre or subject, I’ll be they all have one thing in common; great, wonderful and believable characters. Characters that are distinct, illustrative, and alive. Characters that leap off the page and into your heart. Characters that once you are finished with that book you are sad to leave but will remember forever.

Reread that last sentence. “Characters that … you are sad to leave but will remember forever.” Now, think of your closest friends. The line between characters in fiction and your greatest friends is a fine one, isn’t it. Chances are you like, love, and respect your friends that reflect the virtues you yourself hold most dear. It’s very much the same with the characters we enjoy in our reading, isn’t it?

What if we turn that lense upon ourselves? Realizing what is true for us may be true for our friends, take the thought from the other perspective. What do your friends value in you? Why are they friends with you? What does that tell you about them? What does that tell you about you?

Character makes Great Characters

Whether our friends are found in paperback or in the flesh-and-blood, it’s their character that draws us in. I discovered this both with my failed attempt at writing a long-thought-of novel and over a lifetime of friendships. The people I love and respect most in my life, or my readings have very defined senses of self. So well defined that their stances on, well, anything are inimitable and could only be theirs and theirs alone. For example, if I asked any of them to free-associate on any number of things, I would receive personalized statements that reflect their own personal character.

For example, how many times have you ever called a friend just to find his or her particular take on an issue because you knew it would be insightful or hilarious, or poignant or whatever – just so absolutely them? How many times have your friends contacted you for just the same thing?

As a quick example, take any set of criteria (political hot button issues, questions of faith, the US Bill of Rights, the Ten Commandments, etc) and any set of interesting, memorable people and you will come up with very distinct and interesting answers. Even if you didn’t agree with their views, I’d bet you’d understand their responses as a natural conclusion of who they are.

If qualities summed up in character can define great friendships so can they too define great characters on a page. Look again at the example in the previous paragraph but this time consider the characters in your favorite books. See if you can map them against some philosophical framework.

For laughs, let me use the example of the characters from Lord of the Rings. I’d bet that Samwise, Legolas, Gandalf and Gimli would interpret different portions of the Scout Law very differently. I bet their answers would change depending where they were in the narrative. I’d also bet their would be common threads between them. Those common threads, the reader could rationalize, would form the foundations of their relationship. As an aspiring author I can tell you that it is those individualistic answers that form a litmus test for believable, interesting characters and that common thread the story arch.

I believe the same is true in our own personal lives and relationships. Well-defined positions reasoned well past the point of ‘I don’t know’ and ‘just because’ to their fundamental, irreducable elements create interesting people. The juxtaposition of values – be them shared, at cross purposes with, or antiethical to – create the story arcs of our lives. There is no history, but the interactions of people.

Over the next few weeks as I explore the characteristics Trustworthy, Loyal, Friendly, Courteous, Kind, Obedient, Cheerful, Brave, clean, and Reverent I’ll ask you to do the same. What is the nature of these terms? Think about what these concepts mean to you. What do you think it means to others in your lives or to the characters you read about? What do you think they believe these characteristics mean to you? What do the differences and the similarities indicate? Next week I’ll share some thoughts on framework. Thanks for reading!

This entry was posted in Core and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Real wrath of God type stuff

Quick break from our regularly scheduled programing for some fun! This week’s news cycle has me thinking of one of my all-time favorite movie scenes:

wrath of god

First try reading this as the script was laid out:

Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.

Mayor: What do you mean, “biblical”?

Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor. Real wrath of God type stuff.

Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly.

Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!

Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes…

Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave!

Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria!

Mayor: All right, all right! I get the point!

Now try reading this as with some current events:

Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.

Mayor: What do you mean, “biblical“?

Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor. Real wrath of God type stuff.

Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly.

Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!

Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes

Winston Zeddemore: I get the point!

What did you see that caught your eye this week?

The Scout Law Project

In my last article I wrote about procrastination. I promised to share my way of thinking about how I am going to get out of my current writing morass. Here it is:

I am going to revisit the first framework that ever meant anything to me; the Boy Scout Law.

neuschwanstien castle

The Boy Scout Law

In case you need a refresher, this is the Boy Scout Law

“A Scout is ”

  1. Trustworthy
  2. Loyal
  3. Helpful
  4. Friendly
  5. Courteous
  6. Kind
  7. Obedient
  8. Cheerful
  9. Thrifty
  10. Brave
  11. Clean
  12. Reverent

That’s it. A simple 12 points to help me get back on track. I realize this plan may not exactly be self-apparent. Allow me to explain.

As discussed last time, the reasons I stopped writing was my lack of belief that what I was doing – NaNoWriMo – would lead to anything of value. NaNoWriMo had a framework, write 50,000 words in some 30 days. The part of me that lets me write shut down not because I wasn’t producing. It shut down because I was producing crap. I was producing crap not because I didn’t have a framework – 50,000 words in a month is a framework. The issue was that I was building on a poor foundation. In the end it doesn’t matter if you are trying to build a house over a sinkhole, raise a child without a moral backing, or write. If you don’t have a good foundation, your project will fail.

Lucky for me, fixing foundation errors in writing is much easier than those in brick and mortar or flesh and blood. I want to take a little time over the next few weeks to explore each of those laws – memories of reciting them as a boy and the lessons of how they apply to me now. The writing practice will certainly help me but it is really the exploration of the total sum of ideas these words reflect that rather than the values ascribed to them by Boy Scouts that appeals to me.

Of course, as with many things I do there are a few other reasons why I am exploring these 12 notions – I’ll explain those along the way, too.

Can’t wait to get started! Hope you’ll join me!